updated result file @ mysql-test/t/partition.test Bug#46639: 1030 (HY000): Got error 124 from storage engine on INSERT ... Any place I can get a list of MySQL error code and know what they mean? If the first index is dropped, it works fine: mysql> ALTER TABLE met DROP INDEX `mid`; Query OK, 2 rows affected (0.11 sec) Records: 2 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql> INSERT Added testcase @ storage/myisam/mi_search.c Bug#46639: 1030 (HY000): Got error 124 from storage engine on INSERT ...
If I run a check table on this table I get the following: +-----------------+-------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Table | Op | Msg_type | Msg_text | +-----------------+-------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------+ | my_db.my_active | check | error | In mysql 4, you could get away with some differences between the definition of the merge table and the underlying tables. This configuration has been working fine for years, with no recent changes. It's MySQL 4.1.22 on a RedHat Enterprise 4.0 box.
I found some reference to index size issues when googling this error message. Return HA_ERR_END_OF_FILE instead of HA_ERR_WRONG_INDEX when there are no rows. [24 Aug 2009 7:18] Mattias Jonsson pushed into mysql-5.1-bugteam and mysql-pe [2 Sep 2009 16:42] Bugs System Pushed into 5.1.39 (revid:[email protected]) However, I am encountering a problem with transferring a big table (with 11 million record). Out of curiosity I did look at MySQL 4.1 artical and was surprised to find Bug #20357 made it all the way through to MySQL 5.1.12 & 5.1.31.
The particulars are below. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. OS: Win 2000 server MySQL: mysql 4.1 I have an issue trying to restore some databases from a disk replaced, I mean, move from the old disk to the new one, here Deviad ha scritto: > Hello, > I have been training for a test on Database Design and MySQL. > The following is inside a file we have to run before starting
Part1 Updating SQL Server 2008 R2 Cluster withSP1 Archives March 2014 January 2014 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 Categories BIDS bugs CMD URL: The information about this bug in Launchpad is automatically pulled daily from the remote bug. Problem was that when bulk insert is used on an empty table/partition, it disables the indexes for better performance, but in this specific case it also tries to read from that As you've discovered, the structure and index definitions must now be exactly the same, otherwise you will get errors.
Closed. [1 Oct 2009 5:58] Bugs System Pushed into 5.1.39-ndb-6.3.28 (revid:[email protected]) (version source revid:[email protected]) (merge vers: 5.1.39-ndb-6.3.28) (pib:11) [1 Oct 2009 7:25] Bugs System Pushed into 5.1.39-ndb-7.0.9 (revid:[email protected]) (version source revid:[email protected]) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885162 It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Oracle or any other party. Executed mysql server details < script.sql and checked the output from issuing another SHOW INDEX FROM tablename; command. This session was originally scheduled for October 15th but had to be postponed for technical reasons.
You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/80995 3072 Mattias Jonsson 2009-08-18 Bug#46639: 1030 (HY000): Got error 124 from storage engine on INSERT ... see here Should we store these files as blobs in MYSQL or in the file system and then store only the name in the database. Index corrupted? None, the status of the bug is updated manually.
Oleksandr "Sanja" Byelkin (sanja-byelkin) wrote on 2011-11-29: #6 Fixed by the patch which fixed LP BUG#859375 and LP BUG#887458 Changed in maria: status: Confirmed → Fix Released See full activity log SELECT statement on an empty partition of a user-partitioned table failed with ERROR 1030 (HY000): Got error 124 from storage engine. LIMIT 1 failed: 1030 Got error 124 "Wrong index given to function" from storage engineLog in PrintExport XMLExport Word Details Type: Bug Status: Closed Priority: Minor Resolution: Fixed Affects Version/s: 10.0.0, http://blogeurope.net/got-error/got-error-127-from-storage-engine-when-dumping-table.php I have MYSQL version 5.1.x.
Post navigation SSIS: Read SQL Script files and Output to .csvfiles Don't Code Because YouCan Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here... Please consider...Default Storage Engine in Mysql-generalHello mysql, Greetings in the New Year to everyone. SELECT ...
GBiz is too! Latest News Stories: Docker 1.0Heartbleed Redux: Another Gaping Wound in Web Encryption UncoveredThe Next Circle of Hell: Unpatchable SystemsGit 2.0.0 ReleasedThe Linux Foundation Announces Core Infrastructure Thread• Got error 124 from storage enginestutiredboy25Aug • RE: Got error 124 from storage engineGavinTowey25Aug • Re: Got error 124 from storage enginestutiredboy26Aug © 1995, 2016, Oracle Corporation Key based reads are now allowed for merge tables with no underlying tables defined. @ mysql-test/t/merge.test Backport of revid:[email protected]/june.mysql.com-20080414125521-40866 Modified a test case according to fix for BUG#35274. Luckly we did not need a change request so I issued the ALTER TABLE tablename ENABLE KEYS; command on all six servers to resolve the issue.
SELECT ... The size of the MYI file on disk is about 824MB - much smaller then some others. The question I would like to ask is. Get More Info Regards, Gavin Towey -----Original Message----- From: stutiredboy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:23 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Got error 124 from storage engine hi, all: i have met an question
You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/44359 [email protected], 2008-03-24 15:12:46+04:00, [email protected] +3 -0 BUG#35274 - merge table doesn't need any base tables, gives error 124 when key accessed SELECT queries that The application engine was however, using the database and was happily processing new records. When it tries to save the text to the table in the database, I get the error, "#HY000Got error 139 from storage engine". ...Got Error 1 From Storage Engine in Mysql-generalHi The problem was in wrong error being returned. @ mysql-test/r/merge.result Backport of revid:[email protected]/june.mysql.com-20080324111246-00461 A test case for BUG#35274. @ mysql-test/t/merge.test Backport of revid:[email protected]/june.mysql.com-20080324111246-00461 A test case for BUG#35274. @ storage/myisammrg/myrg_queue.c Backport
Thanks a ...ERROR 1030 (HY000): Got Error 127 From Storage Engine in Mysql-generalHi, I am running MySQL 4.1.8-Max-log on two Linux machine (machine A and machine B). Key based reads are now allowed for merge tables with no underlying tables defined. @ storage/myisammrg/myrg_queue.c Backport of revid:[email protected]/june.mysql.com-20080414125521-40866 In 5.1 we cannot rely on info->open_tables value when checking if a reverted the patch for bug#38005, since that was a workaround around this problem, not needed after fixing it in myisam. @ storage/myisam/mi_search.c Bug#46639: 1030 (HY000): Got error 124 from storage engine Did a row count and SHOW INDEX FROM tablename; statement.
Solution was to allow index reads on disabled indexes if there are no records. The theory was the script crashed out on the first duplicate entry and ignored the rest of the script. I took a row count before starting the import, to checked that records If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. Mark as duplicate Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications.
Which is not ...PBXT 0.9.73 Storage Engine For MySQL 5.1.12 Beta Released in Mysql-generalDear MySQL developers and users, With the just released MySQL 5.1.12 Beta version we now have an excellent Despite this error on insertion, the insert appears to complete successfully - my row count goes up, I can query against it (the actual table, and the merge table) and get